Three years ago, I compared the Finals records of LeBron and Jordan and concluded that:
- LeBron has gone up against harder Finals competition
- Jordan had a much deeper supporting cast
- Both players had comparable starting teammates
- Jordan did have a top 25 all-time teammate for all 6 titles in Scottie Pippen
Since then, LeBron has completed three more Finals and won one of them to move to 4-6 in 10 Finals.
As before, I took every season in which either player made the NBA Finals and compared the other starters' average PER on each team, the top two units' average PER (starters and top five bench players), and each star's PER in each season.
For LeBron, winning titles and Finals MVP on three different teams (which no one else has ever done) leads to a completely stylistic question - is that more or less impressive than winning two separate three-peats with the same franchise + coach + nucleus?
What still sets LeBron's path apart as more difficult is the competition he faced in the Finals:
As Zach Lowe writes,
Do you prefer peak value or long-term near-peak consistency? How much do you weigh LeBron's 2011 Finals collapse against Jordan's perfection?
Kevin Pelton's "Championships Added" metric rates Jordan as higher consistently in the Finals, but LeBron's longevity over 10 Finals has him up in total, 2.94 Championships Added to Jordan's 2.21.
Jordan had a better peak. But LeBron has already had the better career. So who is the G.O.A.T.? Does LeBron's human moment of weakness in 2011 outweigh arguably the two greatest titles, over the greatest regular season team ever in the greatest comeback ever (73-9 Warriors, down 3-1) and in the most unique circumstances in the history of the sport (this year, 2020)?
He lost when he should have won. He won when he should have lost. And then he delivered one of the greatest comebacks in sports history.
No comments:
Post a Comment